<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Venus de Milo: DOF in Photoshop CS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/</link>
	<description>random musings from Joe, Dave, and friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merno</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Merno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what a DOF is , but I like this version of the pic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what a DOF is , but I like this version of the pic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why shooting with my wussy digital isn&#039;t lighting my fire. I&#039;d like to have the control I had back in the Canon AE-1 days, but there are so many other things to spend fifteen hundred dollars on. The aforementioned trip to Europe, for one. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why shooting with my wussy digital isn&#8217;t lighting my fire. I&#8217;d like to have the control I had back in the Canon AE-1 days, but there are so many other things to spend fifteen hundred dollars on. The aforementioned trip to Europe, for one. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>All of the fixed lens digital cameras I&#039;ve owned seem to strive for full DOF. You can manipulate the DOF but it&#039;s a lot of fussing with the manual over-rides. The auto settings will give you full DOF unless you&#039;re fairly close to the subject and you use the &quot;portrait&quot; mode. Of course optical DOF is much better than PS tricks but it is much easier to achieve optical DOF with a digital SLR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the fixed lens digital cameras I&#8217;ve owned seem to strive for full DOF. You can manipulate the DOF but it&#8217;s a lot of fussing with the manual over-rides. The auto settings will give you full DOF unless you&#8217;re fairly close to the subject and you use the &#8220;portrait&#8221; mode. Of course optical DOF is much better than PS tricks but it is much easier to achieve optical DOF with a digital SLR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 20:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/2006/07/08/venus-de-milo-dof-in-photoshop-cs/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>This is pretty cool. Venus really pops here, much more so than if you&#039;d left the DOF alone. Did that camera have enough flexibility to allow you to manipulate DOF to get the shot to look that way in-camera? Compare this snap to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nykiwis.com/Paris-London-2002-152.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stuff&lt;/a&gt; most people shoot on vacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty cool. Venus really pops here, much more so than if you&#8217;d left the DOF alone. Did that camera have enough flexibility to allow you to manipulate DOF to get the shot to look that way in-camera? Compare this snap to the <a href="http://www.nykiwis.com/Paris-London-2002-152.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">stuff</a> most people shoot on vacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
