<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Witless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/</link>
	<description>random musings from Joe, Dave, and friends</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5617</guid>
		<description>We saw it a couple weeks back, and yea, it was disappointing. The ending was terrible with the flying saucer crap. Bad, bad,bad. And the magnetic crystal alien head that ants don't like. what the hell is THAT about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We saw it a couple weeks back, and yea, it was disappointing. The ending was terrible with the flying saucer crap. Bad, bad,bad. And the magnetic crystal alien head that ants don&#8217;t like. what the hell is THAT about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other Jim</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5612</link>
		<dc:creator>Other Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5612</guid>
		<description>RAAAAACK! Cave of Wonders!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RAAAAACK! Cave of Wonders!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patti</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5609</link>
		<dc:creator>Patti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5609</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Is it really that ridiculous?  Are there SERIOUSLY aliens in it? Holy crap.  The City of Gold?  They totally stole that from National Treasure:2  Which, by the way, isn't that bad of a movie except for the fact that they use pretty much the same way to light the hidden cave of treasures as they did in the first movie.  Can't they be a bit more original?  

Perhaps we will wait till it comes to video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Is it really that ridiculous?  Are there SERIOUSLY aliens in it? Holy crap.  The City of Gold?  They totally stole that from National Treasure:2  Which, by the way, isn&#8217;t that bad of a movie except for the fact that they use pretty much the same way to light the hidden cave of treasures as they did in the first movie.  Can&#8217;t they be a bit more original?  </p>
<p>Perhaps we will wait till it comes to video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maz</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5608</link>
		<dc:creator>maz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5608</guid>
		<description>That was pretty funny!

I was surprised that he didn’t make any mention to that magnetism scenario. If it was so strong, how come it only worked when somebody was looking for it to work? It was like an electro magnet that somebody was turning on and off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was pretty funny!</p>
<p>I was surprised that he didn’t make any mention to that magnetism scenario. If it was so strong, how come it only worked when somebody was looking for it to work? It was like an electro magnet that somebody was turning on and off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5606</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5606</guid>
		<description>Oh, holy crap. &lt;a href='http://www.the-editing-room.com/indianajones4.html' rel="nofollow"&gt;this abridged script&lt;/a&gt; completely nails it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, holy crap. <a href='http://www.the-editing-room.com/indianajones4.html' rel="nofollow">this abridged script</a> completely nails it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other Jim</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5605</link>
		<dc:creator>Other Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5605</guid>
		<description>Dave, you do gardening and you're........oh, bad example.  I'm sure "The Mummy 3 - Return of the Cashflow" will be just lovely.  As we wait for the inevitable family outing to see Wall-E.  Thank you, Disney marketing machine - we have Wall-E books and a game already.  When does the movie come out?  Oh yeah -- not yet.

Actually, I read Rachel Weisz didn't want to do Mummy 3 because she didn;t feel like bringing her 5 week old child to China for 5 weeks to film. Seems pretty reasonable -- I mean I haven't been to China, but if I could, I wouldn't go.  10 devalued American dollars say they screw up the Olympics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, you do gardening and you&#8217;re&#8230;&#8230;..oh, bad example.  I&#8217;m sure &#8220;The Mummy 3 - Return of the Cashflow&#8221; will be just lovely.  As we wait for the inevitable family outing to see Wall-E.  Thank you, Disney marketing machine - we have Wall-E books and a game already.  When does the movie come out?  Oh yeah &#8212; not yet.</p>
<p>Actually, I read Rachel Weisz didn&#8217;t want to do Mummy 3 because she didn;t feel like bringing her 5 week old child to China for 5 weeks to film. Seems pretty reasonable &#8212; I mean I haven&#8217;t been to China, but if I could, I wouldn&#8217;t go.  10 devalued American dollars say they screw up the Olympics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5604</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5604</guid>
		<description>Bahahahahah!




Sorry Jackie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bahahahahah!</p>
<p>Sorry Jackie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5603</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5603</guid>
		<description>Sure. As bad as it's going to be, I'm sure &lt;i&gt;The Mummy is Back, Again&lt;/i&gt; will be more exciting than &lt;i&gt;The Constant Gardener&lt;/i&gt;.

I mean seriously. Do you know how boring gardeners are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure. As bad as it&#8217;s going to be, I&#8217;m sure <i>The Mummy is Back, Again</i> will be more exciting than <i>The Constant Gardener</i>.</p>
<p>I mean seriously. Do you know how boring gardeners are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackie</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5602</link>
		<dc:creator>jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5602</guid>
		<description>Rachel Weisz won an OSCAR. Ya think she's gonna sign up for another tour of food poisoning in Morocco?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel Weisz won an OSCAR. Ya think she&#8217;s gonna sign up for another tour of food poisoning in Morocco?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/06/16/witless/#comment-5599</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=201#comment-5599</guid>
		<description>A &lt;em&gt;Mummy&lt;/em&gt; movie without Rachel Weisz? What's the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <em>Mummy</em> movie without Rachel Weisz? What&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
