<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of an Analogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twodinks.com/2008/10/30/the-death-of-an-analogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/10/30/the-death-of-an-analogy/</link>
	<description>wordpress, genesis framework, types &#38; views, and assorted nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/10/30/the-death-of-an-analogy/comment-page-1/#comment-5870</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=436#comment-5870</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve had a progressive tax for what...nearly 80 years now? The problem with the simplistic argument is that it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; simplistic. The complicated &quot;real world&quot; example is over the top, sure, but it&#039;s closer to the real world than the first example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve had a progressive tax for what&#8230;nearly 80 years now? The problem with the simplistic argument is that it&#8217;s <i>too</i> simplistic. The complicated &#8220;real world&#8221; example is over the top, sure, but it&#8217;s closer to the real world than the first example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other Jim</title>
		<link>http://twodinks.com/2008/10/30/the-death-of-an-analogy/comment-page-1/#comment-5868</link>
		<dc:creator>Other Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twodinks.com/?p=436#comment-5868</guid>
		<description>It was funny but he actually does nothing to refute the progressive tax argument -- which is still true.  Not good or bad, just true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was funny but he actually does nothing to refute the progressive tax argument &#8212; which is still true.  Not good or bad, just true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

